The Global Master Insurance Program
Updated: Sep 1
MWB GLOBAL RISKS' INSIGHTS AT A GLANCE: Complex Topics. Clear Insights.
This document is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be exhaustive. No discussions or opinions in this document should be inferred as legal advice. Contact MWB Global Risks for insurance advice customized to your business needs. MWB Global Risks Inc. does not accept responsibility for the content of the information provided or any actions made on the basis of the information herein.
Please note: The article below is a snippet of the entire report. To view the entire report, please download below.
What Global Organizations Should Know
Streamline Business & Save Costs with a Global Master Program
Questions organizations will need to answer include:
What types of exposures exist in this country? What do their local insurance policies cover? Do their local insurance policies conflict with or provide coverage that is consistent with the Master Insurance Policy? How do I close the gaps to safeguard my business?
The answers to those questions can be found within this article.
But before we go into the purpose and benefits of a Global Master Insurance Policy, let’s consider what it looks like without one.
Multinational Companies Without a Global Master Policy: A Hypothetical Case Study
At it stands currently, the 6 locations are located within Canada; however, since each location is in a different province, each location has its own dedicated commercial insurance program with various policies.
Now, before Gordon’s Cereals can make the leap across the pond, they will need to complete their due diligence: researching and understanding the legal and regulatory landscape for commercial insurance in the UK and the additional risks they are exposed
to that they may not be exposed to in
Canada.
Some risks and exposures the company should consider in the UK include (but are not limited to):
→ Property & Operational Risk
When assessing risks for a business, it’s important to consider both the usual hazards, such as fires, floods, natural disasters, and equipment breakdown, as well as operational challenges that could disrupt day-to-day activities.
Supply chain issues are particularly critical: businesses need to evaluate where products are being shipped both outbound and inbound, understand the associated costs and timelines, and weigh the likelihood of delays against their potential impact on operations.
Additionally, in certain areas of the UK, terrorism remains a genuine concern, and this threat must be factored into any comprehensive risk assessment and corporate due diligence to ensure the safety of personnel and continuity of business operations.
→ Regulatory & Legal Risk
Since non-admitted insurance is generally prohibited in the UK -- except for a few limited exceptions --obtaining a local insurance policy from a reputable and licensed UK insurer is highly advisable.
Doing so not only ensures compliance with local regulations but also provides protection that is recognized and enforceable under UK law.
Additionally, food production laws and regulations differ significantly between Canada and the UK, making it essential for businesses to fully understand and adhere to these requirements.
→ Employee Risk
In addition to general business risks, UK law requires all employers carry Employers’ Liability Insurance, ensuring coverage for employees in the event of work-related injuries or illnesses.
Health and safety laws and regulations also differ between Canada and the UK, and these differences must be carefully accounted for when operating a facility abroad.
Adhering to local requirements is not only a legal obligation, but also a critical component of protecting staff, maintaining operational continuity, and avoiding costly fines or disruptions. Combining compliance with a proactive approach to workplace safety helps businesses build a strong, responsible presence in the UK market.
→ Reputational & Liability Risk
Food production facilities face significant operational risks, including contamination, spills, and the mislabeling of allergens or chemicals, which can result in employee injuries or illnesses on-site.
Beyond internal staff, injuries to third parties, such as contractors or visitors, also present potential liability concerns.
Additionally, breaches of health and safety regulations or product recalls can lead to costly reputational damage, impacting customer trust and long-term business success.
Proactively managing these risks through strict safety protocols, thorough staff training, and robust quality control measures is essential to maintaining both operational integrity and brand reputation.
→ Barcode Standards & Compliance
Companies engaged in food and beverage (F&B) manufacturing in the UK must comply with specific barcode regulations and broader labelling laws before entering production.
Barcodes are not only a commercial requirement; they also play a critical role in legal traceability, product-recall readiness, and overall supply-chain compliance.
Barcodes must be scannable and meet ISO standards for size, contrast, and reflectivity. They must also be verified to ensure quality and to prevent supply-chain or retail rejections.
Regular barcode verification is essential to avoid fines, lost contracts, and product recalls resulting from illegible or incorrect coding.
Non-compliance in the UK food and beverage manufacturing sector can create significant third-party legal liability. If products fail to meet safety, labelling, or traceability requirements, manufacturers, importers, retailers, and wholesalers may face civil action from consumers or regulatory bodies who suffer harm or incur damages due to defective or mis-labelled products.
Although Canada does have its own barcode standards and regulations, they are not as strict.
Whereas in the UK it is compulsory for every business to operate under strict barcode, labelling, and GS1 standards, Canada’s barcode regulations are optional and not mandatory under the Safe Food for Canadians Regulations. Canada considers barcode errors as quality control issues and not regulatory exposures.
→ Financial & Compliance Risk
Financial & Compliance Risks
Although a local policy is highly recommended, it is possible to attempt to and seek recovery for loss or damage through your Master Insurance Program; however, there are imposed fees, taxes, and penalties implemented by the country in question (in this case, the UK) that must be considered in the event of a claim.
The reasons for this are many, however, the largest one is because when no local policy is purchased in the UK, the UK loses out on premium tax revenue and can’t regulate the foreign insurer.
Local insurance requirements exist to ensure claims are enforceable, policyholders are protected, and the domestic insurance market is supported.
Should an employee get injured (for example) and said employee puts in a claim with the company and the claim is accepted, the employee would be entitled to a certain amount of compensation.
However, if no local policy was obtained, the company would be barred from filing a claim in the UK because, by UK law, the employee injury claim would fall under the UK’s Employers’ Liability Insurance — which must be a UK-admitted policy. Without a UK-admitted policy (i.e.: local policy), the claim would then need to be processed through the Canadian policy.
This would result in the claims compensation having to be converted and delivered to the employee in Canadian currency.
What Do the Numbers Say?
Hypothetically, we will say that the Gordon’s Cereals employee at the London facility is awarded compensation of $500,000 – that’s $500,000 Canadian. As of this writing, the CAD to GBP (British Pounds) is 1 CAD = 0.5354 GBP.
Therefore, $500,000 CAD would be equivalent to £267,700 GBP.
Thus, in this hypothetical scenario, this UK-based employee wouldn’t receive the claim amount he or she would have received if Gordon’s Cereals had previously secured a local policy.
However, the most pressing concern in this scenario would be the fact that, in Canada, Employers’ Liability Insurance is called Worker’s Compensation and the two insurances – although basically the same idea – vary greatly in their regulations and policies - and how they are implemented.
Conflicts that Arise Without Local Insurance
How Non-Admitted Insurance Can Greatly Impact Your Business
Conflicts that can arise include violation of UK insurance & labour laws, UK penalties for non-admitted insurance, tax & reporting obligations, civil liability, Canadian tax issues, penalties for criminal liability and/or director liability, and/or reputational damage
VIOLATION OF UK INSURANCE LAWS
Since Gordon’s Cereals did not have a local policy in the UK, they also did not have a policy for Employers’ Liability, which is required by UK law, Gordon’s Cereals would ultimately be penalized.
UK Penalties for Non-Admitted Insurance
£2,500 per day the business operates without the required insurance
If the company never held ELI, this fine could accumulate over time
Additional fines up to £1,000 maybe imposed, for failing to produce an Employers Liability Insurance Certificate upon request by an inspector.
Tax & Reporting Obligations
Paying $500,000 CAD directly as compensation or settlement may trigger payroll tax, income tax, and corporate tax issues. If the compensation is classified as employment income (rather than damages for the injury), Gordon’s Cereal may have to pay additional fees which may include:
Civil Liability
Since the injured employee ultimately received nearly 50% less compensation than expected, they may still pursue legal action against Gordon’s Cereals if they believe the settlement was inadequate.
If unsuccessful in defending the claim, Gordon’s Cereals could then face additional legal costs, damages, and court fees out of pocket.
Canadian Taxes
Although the injury occurred in the UK, Gordon’s Cereals remains a Canadian company, meaning the CRA may still review whether the $500,000 claims payment qualifies as a deductible business expense.
Further complications may arise if the UK operation is structured as a branch or permanent establishment rather than a legal subsidiary, potentially triggering additional Canadian tax reporting obligations.
Penalties for Criminal Liability and/or Director Penalties
In the UK, company directors can actually be held legally responsible for failures to comply with employer insurance obligation which could result in hefty fines, criminal prosecution, and/or disqualification from acting as a director.
Reputational Damage & Regulatory Scrutiny
A Canadian company operating abroad without complying with local insurance and employment laws could face operational shutdowns, lost contracts, costly market exits, and increased regulatory scrutiny in both the UK and Canada.
Estimated Costs/Risks Associated with Non-Admitted Insurance
ITEM | ESTIMATED COST |
Employer’s Liability Insurance Violation Fine | £2,500/day (up to hundreds of thousands CAD) |
Civil settlement payout | $500,000 CAD |
Legal fees (defense, compliance, settlements) | $50,000–$200,000 CAD |
NICs and Payroll Tax (if deemed taxable) | 13.8%+ on the payout |
Possible director fines or disqualifications | Varies |
Loss of tax deductibility (corporate taxes) | Up to 26.5% of $500k if disallowed |
Reputational damage | Unquantifiable |
Hypothetical Case Study: A Summary
The hypothetical scenario examined thus far only provided an example of one considerable risk: employee liability. But there are so many more risks that need to be considered as well as which policies should be implemented to protect against which risks.
To combat all the additional and complex risks associated with doing business overseas, there are various individual lines of coverage that should be considered over and above the Canadian Policy:
UK Property & Casualty
Coverage, commercial P&C insurance differs significantly between Canada and the UK. The differences extend beyond policy wording and include mandatory insurance requirements and claims regulations that are not addressed under a Canadian policy.
In Canada, Business Interruption coverage is typically optional and added separately to a P&C policy. In the UK, it is generally included automatically within Property & Casualty coverage.
UK P&C policies also include mandatory Employers’ Liability insurance, which does not exist in the same form in Canada. Canada’s closest equivalent is Workers’ Compensation, a separate government-run program requiring business registration rather than a private insurance policy.
As a result, the Canadian policy would not be considered “admitted” in the UK due to the significant differences between Canadian and UK Property & Casualty requirements.
This means Gordon’s Cereals would need to secure a separate UK-issued P&C policy to properly protect its UK operations.
UK Public Liability Insurance
In Canada, this coverage is called Commercial General Liability (CGL) insurance. In the UK, the equivalent is Public Liability Insurance, which protects businesses against third-party liability claims.
Canadian CGL policies are typically broader and may include products/completed operations, personal injury, and legal defense costs, while UK Public Liability coverage is generally more limited to third-party bodily injury and property damage.
Although similar, the differences between these coverages can create significant gaps.
As a result, Gordon’s Cereals would need a separate UK-issued Public Liability Insurance policy to properly protect its UK operations.
Key Multinational Insurance Considerations
Vital Lines of Coverage for UK Businesses
In addition to P&C and Employer Liability Coverage, these 10 lines of coverage are vital for any company doing business in the United Kingdom:
Business Interruption (BI)
Public Liability (specific to the UK)
Product Liability
Product Recall
Cyber Liability
Commercial Auto & Fleet
Environmental Pollution
Cargo / Stock Throughput
Equipment Breakdown
Contingent Business Interruption (CBI)
Patchwork Policies Create Chaos & Confusion
A “Patchwork Policy” refers to an insurance program that has been pieced together using multiple separate policies, endorsements, insurers, or jurisdictions that may not align properly.
In multinational insurance, a patchwork program can occur when an organization relies on various local policies without centralized coordination through a properly structured global master program.
So, then, how can Gordon’s Cereals ensure all their various lines of coverage are working for them - specifically when it comes to claims time?
A Local Policy Can Resolve Some of these Challenges
As you can see, purchasing separate policies to cover operations in the UK would be inefficient, time-consuming, and in some cases may not even be possible.
A far more effective solution would be to supplement the Canadian program with a locally issued UK policy placed through an insurer legally authorized to provide coverage in England.
However, while adding a local UK policy helps address regulatory and coverage concerns, Gordon’s Cereals would still be managing six separate policies across Canada in addition to the UK policy, creating a fragmented and difficult-to-manage insurance structure.
"Simply by comparing Canadian Commercial General Liability (CGL) coverage with UK Public Liability Insurance, it becomes quite evident that although both policies are designed to address third-party liability exposures, significant differences in coverage scope, terminology, policy structure, and regulatory expectations can create important coverage gaps between the two jurisdictions. These distinctions highlight the importance of coordinating insurance programs carefully when operating multinationally." - Liz Lopez - CRM, Executive VP, MWB Global Risks
MWB’s Global Master Insurance Program Covers All The Bases - And Then Some
The Gold Standard of Insurance Programs
MWB Global Risks’ Global Master Insurance Program is the gold-standard of insurance programs; it not only combines the Canadian policy with the local UK policy, but it also includes tailored coverage to account for any potential gaps and/or duplications between the Canadian policy and the Local policy, and effectively eliminating administrative redundancies, and surprise costs and/or penalties associated with policy gaps and/or duplications.
As we explained in our report, Beyond Local Policies: The Role of DIC & DIL Coverage, oftentimes, there are significant gaps and/or duplications in coverage between the coverage limits of the Home policy compared to the coverage limits of the Local policy.
However, that is not the only advantage of a Global Master Program.
If Gordon’s Cereals had implemented a Global Master Policy to coordinate coverage across all six Canadian locations and its London facility, the insurer and broker network would have coordinated the placement of the required local UK policy through a licensed insurer authorized to operate in England.
Why is this important?
Because brokers and insurers experienced in multinational risk already understand the insurance regulations, compliance requirements, and market conditions within each jurisdiction. They also maintain established global partnerships that allow them to secure locally compliant coverage efficiently, competitively, and with greater consistency across the overall insurance program.
A Global Master Program is not simply about increasing limits or addressing regulatory requirements.
It is designed to create a coordinated insurance structure that helps reduce coverage gaps, simplify administration, improve claims coordination, and often create long-term cost efficiencies across the organization’s global operations.
Securing Local Insurance Isn’t
As Cut-And-Dry
Local Coverage Requires Local Expertise
Securing local insurance coverage is not always a straightforward process and often involves regulatory, legal, and coverage complexities that can be difficult for a non-insurance professional to navigate. Each country maintains its own insurance laws, licensing requirements, policy structures, mandatory coverages, tax obligations, and claims regulations, all of which must be carefully considered to ensure the coverage is both compliant and effective.
Complexities of Local Insurance
Three of the largest complexities that arise in securing local insurance are:
1. Securing local coverage often requires significant coordination and communication between multiple parties, including insurers, brokers, service providers, and the organization’s internal departments, to ensure the program is properly structured, compliant, and aligned across all jurisdictions.
2. Local coverage also involves a high degree of uncertainty due to the differing laws, regulations, languages, currencies, cultures, and insurance markets within each country, all of which can change over time.
3. If local coverage does not adequately align with the needs of the business - as well as the needs of the regulatory bodies - organizations may face inconsistencies between jurisdictions, may be subject to significant legal, regulatory, financial, and reputational risks, and/or penalties related non-compliance.
The ROI of a Global Master Insurance Program
By consolidating all of Gordon’s Cereals’ insurance policies, including its UK operations, into a coordinated Global Master Program, the organization can reduce redundancies, simplify administration, leverage global purchasing power, and create greater consistency across its overall insurance structure.
In short, a Global Master Insurance Program can generate significant long-term value by centralizing program management, improving pricing efficiencies through economies of scale, reducing coverage gaps and overlapping policies, strengthening oversight of local exposures, and supporting compliance across multiple jurisdictions. The program can also improve claims coordination and provide better risk data to support targeted loss prevention strategies.
More specifically, a Global Master Insurance Program would assist Gordon’s Cereals with:
→ CONSOLIDATING ADMINISTRATIVE TASKS
Rather than managing multiple policies (and insurers) in multiple regions, a single master policy with a global insurer handling the majority of the administrative tasks associated.
→ ECONOMIES OF SCALE
By consolidating global risks with a single carrier, companies gain greater purchasing power (similar to bulk discounts), resulting in lower overall premiums.
→ ELIMINATING REDUNDANCY & GAPS
Centralized management ensures consistent coverage across all operations, eliminates duplicate policies that drive up costs, and prevents gaps that could expose the company to uninsured losses.
→ IMPROVED RISK & DATA MANAGEMENT
The program delivers standardized, centralized data for detailed analysis of global exposures and claims, enabling the identification of trends, pinpointing of problem areas, and implementation of more effective, cost-efficient loss prevention strategies.
→ ENHANCED REGULATORY COMPLAINCE
A Global Master Program ensures local policies comply with each country’s legal and tax requirements, helping avoid costly penalties, sanctions, or operational disruptions from non-compliance.
MWB Global Risks Understands These Complexities
Partnering with a reputable and highly experienced global insurance specialist, such as MWB Global Risks, helps ensure an organization’s insurance program is strategically designed to support its operations, regulatory obligations, and long-term growth objectives.
By consolidating policies under a single coordinated framework, multinational organizations can benefit from streamlined administration, reduced redundancies, improved pricing efficiencies, and more consistent coverage across jurisdictions.
At the same time, centralized oversight helps strengthen compliance, improve claims coordination, and reduce the likelihood of costly coverage gaps.
More importantly, a properly structured Global Master Program provides organizations with greater visibility into their global risk profile, allowing leadership to make more informed decisions while aligning insurance coverage with actual operational exposures.
Ultimately, a Global Master Program is not simply an insurance solution. It is a strategic risk management framework designed to improve resilience, support global growth, and provide organizations with greater confidence as they operate across international markets.
Download a copy of this document below
Get the MWB Difference
Need Help?
Connect with MWB Global Risks to explore insurance and risk management solutions designed around the realities of your business.
MWB Global Risks is a boutique insurance and risk management brokerage specializing in domestic and multinational risk solutions for mid-sized to large organizations operating in increasingly complex environments.
Backed by 100+ years of combined industry experience, our team provides tailored guidance, technical expertise, and coordinated program execution across jurisdictions and industries.
Our approach is built on long-term relationships, responsive service, and a deep understanding of how insurance programs must perform both at placement and at the time of loss.
From multinational insurance structures to complex corporate risk strategies, we help organizations remain resilient, compliant, and prepared for growth in an evolving global landscape.
Insurance Expertise Above & Beyond
Any Risk. Anywhere in the World.
Comments